MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Honda NC750X

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the Honda NC750X (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the Honda NC750X is a adventure bike with 745 cc, 57.8 hp and 226 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 192.0 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NC750X is 85% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the Honda NC750X in 4.49 s; the Honda NC750X is quicker by 4.58 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 41.4 m for the Honda NC750X (with ABS). The Honda NC750X stops 2.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 163 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Honda NC750X. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200Honda NC750X
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine200 cc745 cc
Power24.1 hp57.8 hp
Wet weight158 kg226 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton192.0 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s4.49 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h163 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons