MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha Tracer 9

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the Yamaha Tracer 9 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the Yamaha Tracer 9 is a touring bike with 890 cc, 117.3 hp and 219 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 399.1 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha Tracer 9 is 285% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the Yamaha Tracer 9 in 2.95 s; the Yamaha Tracer 9 is quicker by 6.13 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 45.0 m for the Yamaha Tracer 9 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 stops 1.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 215 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200Yamaha Tracer 9
Classnaked biketouring bike
Engine200 cc890 cc
Power24.1 hp117.3 hp
Wet weight158 kg219 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton399.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s2.95 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m45.0 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h215 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons