MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GTL vs CFMoto 250SR

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GTL (2026) and the CFMoto 250SR (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GTL is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 358 kg; the CFMoto 250SR is a sport bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 365.5 hp/ton versus 105.1 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GTL is 248% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GTL covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.34 s and the CFMoto 250SR in 8.38 s; the BMW K 1600 GTL is quicker by 5.04 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GTL (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the CFMoto 250SR (with ABS). The CFMoto 250SR stops 4.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 142 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GTL and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250SR. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTLCFMoto 250SR
Classtouring bikesport bike
Engine1,649 cc249 cc
Power158.2 hp26.2 hp
Wet weight358 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)365.5 hp/ton105.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.34 s8.38 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h142 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons