MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GTL vs Yamaha R25

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GTL (2026) and the Yamaha R25 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GTL is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 358 kg; the Yamaha R25 is a sport bike with 250 cc, 35.4 hp and 169 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 365.5 hp/ton versus 145.1 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GTL is 152% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GTL covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.34 s and the Yamaha R25 in 6.40 s; the BMW K 1600 GTL is quicker by 3.06 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GTL (with ABS) and 40.0 m for the Yamaha R25 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Yamaha R25 stops 1.0 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 158 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GTL and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Yamaha R25. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTLYamaha R25
Classtouring bikesport bike
Engine1,649 cc250 cc
Power158.2 hp35.4 hp
Wet weight358 kg169 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)365.5 hp/ton145.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.34 s6.40 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m40.0 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h158 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons