MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Honda Africa Twin

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Honda Africa Twin (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Honda Africa Twin is a adventure bike with 1,084 cc, 100.6 hp and 244 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 315.3 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda Africa Twin is 184% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Honda Africa Twin in 3.02 s; the Honda Africa Twin is quicker by 5.89 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 41.4 m for the Honda Africa Twin (with ABS). The Honda Africa Twin stops 6.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 199 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKHonda Africa Twin
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine249 cc1,084 cc
Power26.2 hp100.6 hp
Wet weightno data244 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton315.3 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s3.02 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h199 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons