MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Honda Dio 110

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Honda Dio 110 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Honda Dio 110 is a scooter with 109 cc, 8.6 hp and 96 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 50.2 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250NK is 122% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): CFMoto 250NK 8.91 s, Honda Dio 110 not reached (top simulated speed 68 km/h). In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 17.9 m for the Honda Dio 110 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The CFMoto 250NK stops 0.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 84 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKHonda Dio 110
Classnaked bikescooter
Engine249 cc109 cc
Power26.2 hp8.6 hp
Wet weightno data96 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton50.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 snot reached (top simulated speed 68 km/h)
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m17.9 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h84 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons