MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250SR vs RKS RZ125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250SR (2026) and the RKS RZ125 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250SR is a sport bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the RKS RZ125 is a sport bike with 125 cc, 14.5 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.1 hp/ton versus 63.8 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250SR is 65% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250SR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.38 s and the RKS RZ125 in 13.42 s; the CFMoto 250SR is quicker by 5.04 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the CFMoto 250SR (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the RKS RZ125 (with ABS). Calculated top speed: 142 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 125 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250SR and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the RKS RZ125. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250SRRKS RZ125
Classsport bikesport bike
Engine249 cc125 cc
Power26.2 hp14.5 hp
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.1 hp/ton63.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.38 s13.42 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)142 km/h125 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons