MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CB125F vs Yamaha R7

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CB125F (2025) and the Yamaha R7 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CB125F is a naked bike with 124 cc, 10.7 hp and 117 kg; the Yamaha R7 is a sport bike with 689 cc, 72.4 hp and 189 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 55.9 hp/ton versus 274.3 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha R7 is 391% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CB125F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 21.61 s and the Yamaha R7 in 3.41 s; the Yamaha R7 is quicker by 18.20 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Honda CB125F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 14.4 m for the Yamaha R7 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Yamaha R7 stops 2.9 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 100 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 202 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CB125FYamaha R7
Classnaked bikesport bike
Engine124 cc689 cc
Power10.7 hp72.4 hp
Wet weight117 kg189 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)55.9 hp/ton274.3 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)21.61 s3.41 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m14.4 m
Top speed (calc.)100 km/h202 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons