MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CRF250 Rally vs KTM 390 Duke

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CRF250 Rally (2026) and the KTM 390 Duke (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CRF250 Rally is a enduro bike with 249 cc, 24.1 hp and 153 kg; the KTM 390 Duke is a naked bike with 399 cc, 44.4 hp and 165 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.9 hp/ton versus 184.9 hp/ton. On this measure the KTM 390 Duke is 75% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CRF250 Rally covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 7.61 s and the KTM 390 Duke in 5.48 s; the KTM 390 Duke is quicker by 2.13 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 46.8 m for the Honda CRF250 Rally (with ABS) and 43.7 m for the KTM 390 Duke (with ABS). The KTM 390 Duke stops 3.1 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 123 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 167 km/h (test measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Honda CRF250 Rally and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the KTM 390 Duke. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CRF250 RallyKTM 390 Duke
Classenduro bikenaked bike
Engine249 cc399 cc
Power24.1 hp44.4 hp
Wet weight153 kg165 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.9 hp/ton184.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)7.61 s5.48 s
100-0 km/h braking distance46.8 m43.7 m
Top speed (calc.)123 km/h167 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons