MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda Dio 110 vs Kawasaki Z900

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda Dio 110 (2025) and the Kawasaki Z900 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda Dio 110 is a scooter with 109 cc, 8.6 hp and 96 kg; the Kawasaki Z900 is a naked bike with 948 cc, 122.0 hp and 213 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 50.2 hp/ton versus 423.7 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Z900 is 744% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): Honda Dio 110 not reached (top simulated speed 68 km/h), Kawasaki Z900 3.13 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.9 m for the Honda Dio 110 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 15.7 m for the Kawasaki Z900 (with ABS). The Kawasaki Z900 stops 2.2 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 84 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 234 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda Dio 110Kawasaki Z900
Classscooternaked bike
Engine109 cc948 cc
Power8.6 hp122.0 hp
Wet weight96 kg213 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)50.2 hp/ton423.7 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)not reached (top simulated speed 68 km/h)3.13 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.9 m15.7 m
Top speed (calc.)84 km/h234 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons