MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda NC750X vs Kawasaki KLE500

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda NC750X (2026) and the Kawasaki KLE500 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda NC750X is a adventure bike with 745 cc, 57.8 hp and 226 kg; the Kawasaki KLE500 is a adventure bike with 451 cc, 44.8 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 192.0 hp/ton versus 162.9 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NC750X is 18% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda NC750X covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 4.49 s and the Kawasaki KLE500 in 4.95 s; the Honda NC750X is quicker by 0.45 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.4 m for the Honda NC750X (with ABS) and 41.4 m for the Kawasaki KLE500 (with ABS). Calculated top speed: 163 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 150 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda NC750XKawasaki KLE500
Classadventure bikeadventure bike
Engine745 cc451 cc
Power57.8 hp44.8 hp
Wet weight226 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)192.0 hp/ton162.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)4.49 s4.95 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.4 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)163 km/h150 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons