MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda NX500 vs KTM 250 EXC-F

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda NX500 (2025) and the KTM 250 EXC-F (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda NX500 is a adventure bike with 471 cc, 46.9 hp and 196 kg; the KTM 250 EXC-F is a enduro bike with 250 cc, unlisted power and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 173.2 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the Honda NX500 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 5.11 s and the KTM 250 EXC-F in 7.92 s; the Honda NX500 is quicker by 2.81 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.4 m for the Honda NX500 (with ABS) and 51.5 m for the KTM 250 EXC-F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Honda NX500 stops 10.1 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 152 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 123 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque, weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda NX500KTM 250 EXC-F
Classadventure bikeenduro bike
Engine471 cc250 cc
Power46.9 hpno data
Wet weight196 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)173.2 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)5.11 s7.92 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.4 m51.5 m
Top speed (calc.)152 km/h123 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons