MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Kawasaki Z900 vs RKS RZ125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Kawasaki Z900 (2025) and the RKS RZ125 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Kawasaki Z900 is a naked bike with 948 cc, 122.0 hp and 213 kg; the RKS RZ125 is a sport bike with 125 cc, 14.5 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 423.7 hp/ton versus 63.8 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Z900 is 564% ahead.

In the simulation the Kawasaki Z900 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.13 s and the RKS RZ125 in 13.42 s; the Kawasaki Z900 is quicker by 10.28 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Kawasaki Z900 (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the RKS RZ125 (with ABS). The RKS RZ125 stops 7.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 234 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 125 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Kawasaki Z900 and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the RKS RZ125. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationKawasaki Z900RKS RZ125
Classnaked bikesport bike
Engine948 cc125 cc
Power122.0 hp14.5 hp
Wet weight213 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)423.7 hp/ton63.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.13 s13.42 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)234 km/h125 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons