MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

RKS RZ125 vs Yamaha R25

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The RKS RZ125 (2026) and the Yamaha R25 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The RKS RZ125 is a sport bike with 125 cc, 14.5 hp and unlisted weight; the Yamaha R25 is a sport bike with 250 cc, 35.4 hp and 169 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 63.8 hp/ton versus 145.1 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha R25 is 127% ahead.

In the simulation the RKS RZ125 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 13.42 s and the Yamaha R25 in 6.40 s; the Yamaha R25 is quicker by 7.01 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the RKS RZ125 (with ABS) and 40.0 m for the Yamaha R25 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The RKS RZ125 stops 3.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 125 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 158 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the RKS RZ125 and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Yamaha R25. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationRKS RZ125Yamaha R25
Classsport bikesport bike
Engine125 cc250 cc
Power14.5 hp35.4 hp
Wet weightno data169 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)63.8 hp/ton145.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)13.42 s6.40 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m40.0 m
Top speed (calc.)125 km/h158 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons