MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs CFMoto 250NK

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the CFMoto 250NK (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 111.2 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250NK is 7% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the CFMoto 250NK in 8.91 s; the CFMoto 250NK is quicker by 0.17 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 stops 4.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200CFMoto 250NK
Classnaked bikenaked bike
Engine200 cc249 cc
Power24.1 hp26.2 hp
Wet weight158 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton111.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s8.91 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m48.0 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h115 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons