MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs Harley-Davidson Low Rider S

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the Harley-Davidson Low Rider S (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the Harley-Davidson Low Rider S is a cruiser with 1,923 cc, 114.0 hp and 304 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus 300.8 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GT is 26% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the Harley-Davidson Low Rider S in 3.69 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 0.42 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 49.1 m for the Harley-Davidson Low Rider S (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW K 1600 GT stops 8.1 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 208 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTHarley-Davidson Low Rider S
Classtouring bikecruiser
Engine1,649 cc1,923 cc
Power158.2 hp114.0 hp
Wet weight343 kg304 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/ton300.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s3.69 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m49.1 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h208 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons