MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs KTM 390 Duke

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the KTM 390 Duke (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the KTM 390 Duke is a naked bike with 399 cc, 44.4 hp and 165 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus 184.9 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GT is 105% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the KTM 390 Duke in 5.48 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 2.21 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 43.7 m for the KTM 390 Duke (with ABS). The BMW K 1600 GT stops 2.7 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 167 km/h (test measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GT and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the KTM 390 Duke. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTKTM 390 Duke
Classtouring bikenaked bike
Engine1,649 cc399 cc
Power158.2 hp44.4 hp
Wet weight343 kg165 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/ton184.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s5.48 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m43.7 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h167 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons