MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs Kawasaki Ninja 500

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the Kawasaki Ninja 500 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the Kawasaki Ninja 500 is a sport bike with 451 cc, 44.8 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus 172.9 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GT is 119% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the Kawasaki Ninja 500 in 5.09 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 1.82 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the Kawasaki Ninja 500 (with ABS). The Kawasaki Ninja 500 stops 4.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 186 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTKawasaki Ninja 500
Classtouring bikesport bike
Engine1,649 cc451 cc
Power158.2 hp44.8 hp
Wet weight343 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/ton172.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s5.09 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h186 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons