MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs Yamaha Finn

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the Yamaha Finn (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the Yamaha Finn is a cub / underbone with 114 cc, unlisted power and 100 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the Yamaha Finn in 27.76 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 24.49 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 14.8 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 18.5 m for the Yamaha Finn (without ABS). The BMW K 1600 GT stops 3.8 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 93 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTYamaha Finn
Classtouring bikecub / underbone
Engine1,649 cc114 cc
Power158.2 hpno data
Wet weight343 kg100 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s27.76 s
60-0 km/h braking distance14.8 m18.5 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h93 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons