MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW S 1000 RR vs CFMoto 250NK

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW S 1000 RR (2025) and the CFMoto 250NK (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW S 1000 RR is a sport bike with 999 cc, 206.5 hp and 198 kg; the CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 756.5 hp/ton versus 111.2 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW S 1000 RR is 581% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW S 1000 RR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 2.84 s and the CFMoto 250NK in 8.91 s; the BMW S 1000 RR is quicker by 6.07 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the BMW S 1000 RR (with ABS) and 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW S 1000 RR stops 11.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 287 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW S 1000 RRCFMoto 250NK
Classsport bikenaked bike
Engine999 cc249 cc
Power206.5 hp26.2 hp
Wet weight198 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)756.5 hp/ton111.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)2.84 s8.91 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m48.0 m
Top speed (calc.)287 km/h115 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons