MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Honda NC750X

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Honda NC750X (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Honda NC750X is a adventure bike with 745 cc, 57.8 hp and 226 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 192.0 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NC750X is 73% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Honda NC750X in 4.49 s; the Honda NC750X is quicker by 4.41 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 41.4 m for the Honda NC750X (with ABS). The Honda NC750X stops 6.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 163 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250NK and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Honda NC750X. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKHonda NC750X
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine249 cc745 cc
Power26.2 hp57.8 hp
Wet weightno data226 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton192.0 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s4.49 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h163 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons