MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is a sport bike with 998 cc, 193.1 hp and 209 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 680.0 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is 512% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R in 3.16 s; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is quicker by 5.75 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 36.4 m for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (with ABS). The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R stops 11.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 286 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKKawasaki Ninja ZX-10R
Classnaked bikesport bike
Engine249 cc998 cc
Power26.2 hp193.1 hp
Wet weightno data209 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton680.0 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s3.16 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h286 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons