MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Yamaha XMAX 250

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Yamaha XMAX 250 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Yamaha XMAX 250 is a scooter with 250 cc, 22.4 hp and 183 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 86.8 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250NK is 28% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Yamaha XMAX 250 in 11.65 s; the CFMoto 250NK is quicker by 2.74 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 45.2 m for the Yamaha XMAX 250 (with ABS). The Yamaha XMAX 250 stops 2.8 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 126 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKYamaha XMAX 250
Classnaked bikescooter
Engine249 cc250 cc
Power26.2 hp22.4 hp
Wet weightno data183 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton86.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s11.65 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m45.2 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h126 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons