MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250SR vs Kawasaki Vulcan S

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250SR (2026) and the Kawasaki Vulcan S (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250SR is a sport bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Kawasaki Vulcan S is a cruiser with 649 cc, 59.9 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.1 hp/ton versus 226.5 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Vulcan S is 116% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250SR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.38 s and the Kawasaki Vulcan S in 4.49 s; the Kawasaki Vulcan S is quicker by 3.89 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the CFMoto 250SR (with ABS) and 44.7 m for the Kawasaki Vulcan S (with ABS). The CFMoto 250SR stops 8.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 142 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 173 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250SRKawasaki Vulcan S
Classsport bikecruiser
Engine249 cc649 cc
Power26.2 hp59.9 hp
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.1 hp/ton226.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.38 s4.49 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m44.7 m
Top speed (calc.)142 km/h173 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons