MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250SR vs TVS Raider 125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250SR (2026) and the TVS Raider 125 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250SR is a sport bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the TVS Raider 125 is a naked bike with 125 cc, 11.4 hp and 120 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.1 hp/ton versus 58.5 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250SR is 80% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250SR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.38 s and the TVS Raider 125 in 21.08 s; the CFMoto 250SR is quicker by 12.71 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 13.1 m for the CFMoto 250SR (with ABS) and 17.3 m for the TVS Raider 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The CFMoto 250SR stops 4.2 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 142 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 105 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250SRTVS Raider 125
Classsport bikenaked bike
Engine249 cc125 cc
Power26.2 hp11.4 hp
Wet weightno data120 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.1 hp/ton58.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.38 s21.08 s
60-0 km/h braking distance13.1 m17.3 m
Top speed (calc.)142 km/h105 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons