MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda NT1100 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda NT1100 (2026) and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda NT1100 is a touring bike with 1,084 cc, 100.6 hp and 249 kg; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is a sport bike with 998 cc, 193.1 hp and 209 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 310.4 hp/ton versus 680.0 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is 119% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda NT1100 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.15 s and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R in 3.16 s; the Honda NT1100 is quicker by 0.01 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the Honda NT1100 (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (with ABS). The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R stops 4.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 194 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 286 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda NT1100Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R
Classtouring bikesport bike
Engine1,084 cc998 cc
Power100.6 hp193.1 hp
Wet weight249 kg209 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)310.4 hp/ton680.0 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.15 s3.16 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)194 km/h286 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons