MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE vs KTM 350 EXC-F

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE (2026) and the KTM 350 EXC-F (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE is a touring bike with 1,099 cc, 134.1 hp and unlisted weight; the KTM 350 EXC-F is a enduro bike with 350 cc, unlisted power and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 409.9 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.30 s and the KTM 350 EXC-F in 5.62 s; the Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE is quicker by 2.32 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE (with ABS) and 51.5 m for the KTM 350 EXC-F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Kawasaki Ninja 1100SX SE stops 10.5 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 219 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 138 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque, weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationKawasaki Ninja 1100SX SEKTM 350 EXC-F
Classtouring bikeenduro bike
Engine1,099 cc350 cc
Power134.1 hpno data
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)409.9 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.30 s5.62 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m51.5 m
Top speed (calc.)219 km/h138 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons