MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Yamaha MT-25 vs Yamaha NMAX 125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Yamaha MT-25 (2025) and the Yamaha NMAX 125 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Yamaha MT-25 is a naked bike with 250 cc, 35.4 hp and 166 kg; the Yamaha NMAX 125 is a scooter with 125 cc, 12.1 hp and 132 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 146.9 hp/ton versus 58.3 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha MT-25 is 152% ahead.

In the simulation the Yamaha MT-25 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 6.35 s and the Yamaha NMAX 125 in 20.34 s; the Yamaha MT-25 is quicker by 13.98 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Yamaha MT-25 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 17.9 m for the Yamaha NMAX 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Yamaha MT-25 stops 0.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 147 km/h (derived (GPS ratio)) versus 99 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationYamaha MT-25Yamaha NMAX 125
Classnaked bikescooter
Engine250 cc125 cc
Power35.4 hp12.1 hp
Wet weight166 kg132 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)146.9 hp/ton58.3 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)6.35 s20.34 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m17.9 m
Top speed (calc.)147 km/h99 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons