MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW R 1300 GS vs Honda Activa 125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW R 1300 GS (2024) and the Honda Activa 125 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW R 1300 GS is a adventure bike with 1,300 cc, 143.5 hp and 237 kg; the Honda Activa 125 is a scooter with 124 cc, 8.3 hp and 107 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 459.9 hp/ton versus 45.7 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW R 1300 GS is 907% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW R 1300 GS covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 2.96 s and the Honda Activa 125 in 36.16 s; the BMW R 1300 GS is quicker by 33.21 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 14.9 m for the BMW R 1300 GS (with ABS) and 17.9 m for the Honda Activa 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW R 1300 GS stops 3.0 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 225 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 90 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW R 1300 GSHonda Activa 125
Classadventure bikescooter
Engine1,300 cc124 cc
Power143.5 hp8.3 hp
Wet weight237 kg107 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)459.9 hp/ton45.7 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)2.96 s36.16 s
60-0 km/h braking distance14.9 m17.9 m
Top speed (calc.)225 km/h90 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons