MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW S 1000 RR vs Honda CRF250 Rally

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW S 1000 RR (2025) and the Honda CRF250 Rally (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW S 1000 RR is a sport bike with 999 cc, 206.5 hp and 198 kg; the Honda CRF250 Rally is a enduro bike with 249 cc, 24.1 hp and 153 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 756.5 hp/ton versus 105.9 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW S 1000 RR is 614% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW S 1000 RR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 2.84 s and the Honda CRF250 Rally in 7.61 s; the BMW S 1000 RR is quicker by 4.78 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the BMW S 1000 RR (with ABS) and 46.8 m for the Honda CRF250 Rally (with ABS). The BMW S 1000 RR stops 10.4 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 287 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 123 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the BMW S 1000 RR and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Honda CRF250 Rally. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW S 1000 RRHonda CRF250 Rally
Classsport bikeenduro bike
Engine999 cc249 cc
Power206.5 hp24.1 hp
Wet weight198 kg153 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)756.5 hp/ton105.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)2.84 s7.61 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m46.8 m
Top speed (calc.)287 km/h123 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons