MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda Activa 125 vs Honda NT1100

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda Activa 125 (2025) and the Honda NT1100 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda Activa 125 is a scooter with 124 cc, 8.3 hp and 107 kg; the Honda NT1100 is a touring bike with 1,084 cc, 100.6 hp and 249 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 45.7 hp/ton versus 310.4 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NT1100 is 580% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda Activa 125 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 36.16 s and the Honda NT1100 in 3.15 s; the Honda NT1100 is quicker by 33.01 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.9 m for the Honda Activa 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 14.8 m for the Honda NT1100 (with ABS). The Honda NT1100 stops 3.1 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 90 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 194 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda Activa 125Honda NT1100
Classscootertouring bike
Engine124 cc1,084 cc
Power8.3 hp100.6 hp
Wet weight107 kg249 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)45.7 hp/ton310.4 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)36.16 s3.15 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.9 m14.8 m
Top speed (calc.)90 km/h194 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons