MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CB125F vs Honda XL750 Transalp

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CB125F (2025) and the Honda XL750 Transalp (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CB125F is a naked bike with 124 cc, 10.7 hp and 117 kg; the Honda XL750 Transalp is a adventure bike with 755 cc, 90.5 hp and 210 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 55.9 hp/ton versus 317.6 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda XL750 Transalp is 468% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CB125F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 21.61 s and the Honda XL750 Transalp in 3.23 s; the Honda XL750 Transalp is quicker by 18.38 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Honda CB125F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 14.9 m for the Honda XL750 Transalp (with ABS). The Honda XL750 Transalp stops 2.4 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 100 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 196 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CB125FHonda XL750 Transalp
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine124 cc755 cc
Power10.7 hp90.5 hp
Wet weight117 kg210 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)55.9 hp/ton317.6 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)21.61 s3.23 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m14.9 m
Top speed (calc.)100 km/h196 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons