MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda XL750 Transalp vs Yamaha XMAX 250

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda XL750 Transalp (2025) and the Yamaha XMAX 250 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda XL750 Transalp is a adventure bike with 755 cc, 90.5 hp and 210 kg; the Yamaha XMAX 250 is a scooter with 250 cc, 22.4 hp and 183 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 317.6 hp/ton versus 86.8 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda XL750 Transalp is 266% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda XL750 Transalp covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.23 s and the Yamaha XMAX 250 in 11.65 s; the Honda XL750 Transalp is quicker by 8.42 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.4 m for the Honda XL750 Transalp (with ABS) and 45.2 m for the Yamaha XMAX 250 (with ABS). The Honda XL750 Transalp stops 3.8 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 196 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 126 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda XL750 TransalpYamaha XMAX 250
Classadventure bikescooter
Engine755 cc250 cc
Power90.5 hp22.4 hp
Wet weight210 kg183 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)317.6 hp/ton86.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.23 s11.65 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.4 m45.2 m
Top speed (calc.)196 km/h126 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons